Reliability of orthodontic miniscrews: Bending and maximum load of different Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)

19Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have been introduced into orthodontic clinical practice in order to allow tooth movements while avoiding strain on adjacent teeth. Miniscrews are available in the market with different diameters and materials. Accordingly, the purpose of the present report was to measure and compare the forces to bend and fracture different mini implants. Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel TADs of different manufacturers (Spider ScrewHDC; Mini Implants-Leone; Benefit-Orteam; Storm-Kristal) were evaluated. Two different diameters (1.5 mm and 2.0 mm) were tested. The sample included 10 unused specimens for each group, blocked in an Instron Universal Testing Machine, and a shear load was applied at the neck of the miniscrew. The force to bend the miniscrew was measured at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections. Also, the maximum force before screw fracture was recorded. Data were submitted for statistical analysis. Results showed significantly higher forces for 2.0 mm than 1.5 mm screws, both at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections and at maximum load. Moreover, no significant differences were reported between titanium and stainless steel miniscrews of equal diameters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scribante, A., Montasser, M. A., Radwan, E. S., Bernardinelli, L., Alcozer, R., Gandini, P., & Sfondrini, M. F. (2018). Reliability of orthodontic miniscrews: Bending and maximum load of different Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs). Materials, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071138

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free