Frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) for non-GCB DLBCL

124Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This phase 2 study evaluated whether substituting bortezomib for vincristine in frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy could improve efficacy in non-germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (non-GCB DLBCL), centrally confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Hans method). In total, 164 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive six 21-day cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, all IV day 1, prednisone 100 mg/m2 orally days 1-5, plus either bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 4, 8, 11 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib [VR-CAP]; n 584) or vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum2mg) IV day 1 (R-CHOP; n 580). There were no significant differences between VR-CAP and R-CHOP in complete response rate (64.5%, 66.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.91; P 5 .80), overall response rate (93.4%, 98.6%; OR, 0.21; P 5 .11), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; P 5 .76), or overall survival (HR, 0.89; P 5 .75). Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; 88%, 89%), serious AEs (38%, 34%), discontinuations due to AEs (7%, 3%), and deaths due to AEs (2%, 5%) were similar with VR-CAP and R-CHOP. Grade ≥ peripheral neuropathy rates were 6% and 3%, respectively. VR-CAP did not improve efficacy vs R-CHOP in non-GCB DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01040871.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Offner, F., Samoilova, O., Osmanov, E., Eom, H. S., Topp, M. S., Raposo, J., … Ferhanoglu, B. (2015). Frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) for non-GCB DLBCL. In Blood (Vol. 126, pp. 1893–1901). American Society of Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-03-632430

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free