"If I had said it I would have remembered it": Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic

236Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examined the contributions of decision processes to the rejection of false memories. In two experiments people studied lists of semantically related words and then completed a recognition test containing studied words, unrelated lure words, and related lure words. People who said words aloud at study were less likely to falsely recognize related lures on the test than were those who heard words at study We suggest that people who said words at study employed a distinctiveness heuristic during the test whereby they demanded access to distinctive say information in order to judge an item as old. Even when retrieving say information is not perfectly diagnostic of prior study, as in Experiment 2, in which participants both said and heard words at study, people persist in using the distinctiveness heuristic to reduce false memories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free