Neuroscience: The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

3.3kCitations
Citations of this article
3.7kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB) and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions from a finite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002, November 22). Neuroscience: The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free