Evaluation of fitting and adjustment methods for taper and volume prediction of black pine in Turkey

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A modified form (Cao, Q.V. South. J. Appl. For. 33[2]:58–61, 2009) of the taper model of T.A. Max and H.E. Burkhart (For. Sci. 22[3]:283–289, 1976) was used in this study to predict taper and volume of black pine. A total of 16 methods were evaluated, including 4 fitting methods (optimized for taper, cumulative volume, taper and cumulative volume, and taper and total volume) and 4 adjustment strategies (unadjusted, adjusted to match dbh, predicted total volume, and dbh and predicted total volume). Results showed that adjustment did not improve the performance of the taper model. Also for this data set, the model with parameters optimized for taper and either total or cumulative volume performed better than the other fitting methods in predicting both taper and cumulative volume.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Özçelik, R., & Cao, Q. V. (2017). Evaluation of fitting and adjustment methods for taper and volume prediction of black pine in Turkey. Forest Science, 63(4), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.5849/FS.2016-067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free