Characterization of Bacteroides forsythus isolates

81Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fifteen Bacteroides forsythus strains freshly isolated from patients with periodontitis were used together with three collection strains and one type strain for characterization of growth on various media; determination of enzymatic profiles, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, 16S rRNA ribotypes, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) outer membrane protein profiles, and pathogenicity; and gas chromatography analysis by using a wound chamber model in rabbits. All strains were stimulated by N- acetylmuramic acid, while one strain needed a further supplement such as yeast extract for optimal growth. All strains showed trypsin-like activity. While 10 different ribotypes were found, the SDS-PAGE profiles revealed similar patterns for all strains. All strains were sensitive to penicillin G (MICs, <0.5 μg/ml), ampicillin (MICs, <1.0 μg/ml), amoxicillin (MICs, <0.38 μg/ml), metronidazole (MICs, <0.005 μg/ml), tetracycline (MICs, <0.19 μg/ml), doxycycline (MICs, 0.05 μg/ml), erythromycin (MICs, <0.4 μg/ml), and clindamycin (MICs, <0.016 μg/ml), while they were less sensitive to ciprofloxacin (M/Cs, <4 μg/ml). B. forsythus did not cause abscess formation by monoinoculation. B. forsythus coinoculated with Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 10953 caused abscess formation in 75% of rabbits, while it caused abscess formation in 100% of rabbits when it was coinoculated with Porphyromonas gingivalis FDC 381. In the case of the latter combination, four of six rabbits died of sepsis after 6 to 7 days, and P. gingivalis and B. forsythus were recovered from the heart blood at a proportion of 10:1. B. forsythus strains were highly virulent and invasive in combination with P. gingivalis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takemoto, T., Kurihara, H., & Dahlen, G. (1997). Characterization of Bacteroides forsythus isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35(6), 1378–1381. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1378-1381.1997

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free