Understanding Researchers’ AI Readiness in a Higher Education Context: Q Methodology Research

11Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Taking a human-centered socio-cultural perspective, this study explored the manifold individual and structural processes that contribute to researchers’ AI readiness. Forty-three graduate students and faculty at one university in Qatar took part in this Q methodology study. The results represented participants’ collective perspectives on what they considered relevant to their AI readiness. A 5 + 1-factor solution was accepted, illustrating diverse perspectives and no consensus. The factors were termed based on their main foci, as follows, (F-1) how technical skills are acquired, (F-2) when it is all about ethics, (F-3) when technical skills meet ethical considerations, (F-4a and F-4b) when opposites concede, and (F-5) how collaborations reflect AI readiness. The results revealed the diversity of viewpoints among participants, and the interrelations among some factors. This study recommended a holistic approach to enhance AI readiness. It suggested integrating targeted educational initiatives and developing localized ethical frameworks to promote responsible AI use across various research disciplines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaaban, Y., Qadhi, S., Chen, J., & Du, X. (2024). Understanding Researchers’ AI Readiness in a Higher Education Context: Q Methodology Research. Education Sciences, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070709

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free