Association of macular choroidal thickness with optical coherent tomography morphology in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane

16Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose To compare macular choroidal thickness of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) and fellow eyes, and before and after vitrectomy in terms of the morphological features on spectral- domain optical coherent tomography (SD-OCT). Methods Eighty-four patients with unilateral idiopathic ERM were involved. Patients were categorized into: Group 1, ERM without membrane contraction; Group 2, ERM with membrane contraction and retinal folding; and Group 3, ERM with membrane contraction and macular edema. Twenty-two patients received surgical removal of ERM. Choroidal thickness was compared between ERM and fellow eyes, and before and after treatment. Results Mean choroidal thickness was significantly greater in ERM eyes than in fellow eyes (234.4 ± 22.5 vs 220.6 ± 20.8 μm; P<0.01). Group 1 (n = 20) showed no significant difference in choroidal thickness between ERM and fellow eyes. Eyes in Group 2 (n = 27) and Group 3 (n = 37) showed statistically significant differences in mean choroidal thickness between ERM and fellow eyes (229.6 ± 23.8 vs 220.8 ± 19.6 μm; 242.6 ± 27.8 vs 221.0 ± 21.8 μm, respectively; P<0.05). In Group 2 (n = 8) and Group 3 (n = 16), choroidal thickness in ERM eyes decreased significantly at 1 month and 6 months after surgery, compared with that before surgery (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions Membrane contraction contributed to the increase in choroidal thickness in idiopathic ERM patients. This finding may help to elucidate the pathophysiologic features of idiopathic ERM as well as the response to treatment in these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fang, I. M., & Chen, L. L. (2020). Association of macular choroidal thickness with optical coherent tomography morphology in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free