Thresholds of glycemia and the outcomes of COVID-19 complicated with diabetes: A retrospective exploratory study using continuous glucose monitoring

43Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Although elevated glucose levels are reported to be associated with adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the optimal range of glucose in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the threshold of glycemia and its association with the outcomes of COVID-19. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Glucose levels were assessed through intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in 35patients foran average period of 10.2 days. The percentages of time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), time in range (TIR), and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. Composite adverse outcomes were defined as either the need for admission to the intensive care unit, need for mechanical ventilation, or morbidity with critical illness. RESULTS TARs using thresholds from 160 to 200 mg/dL were significantly associated with composite adverse outcomes after adjustment of covariates. Both TBR (<70 mg/dL) and TIR (70-160 mg/dL), but not mean sensor glucose level, were significantly associated with composite adverse outcomes and prolonged hospitalization. The multivariate-adjusted odds ratios of the CV of sensor glucose across tertiles for composite adverse outcomes of COVID-19 were 1.00, 1.18, and 25.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with diabetes and COVID-19 have an increased risk of adverse outcomes with glucose levels >160 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL and a high CV. Therapies that improve these metrics of glycemic control may result in better prognoses for these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen, Y., Fan, X., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Li, C., Lu, J., … Jia, W. (2021). Thresholds of glycemia and the outcomes of COVID-19 complicated with diabetes: A retrospective exploratory study using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care, 44(4), 976–982. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1448

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free