Comparison of transplant efficiency between spontaneously derived and noggin-primed human embryonic stem cell neural precursors in the quinolinic acid rat model of Huntington's disease

31Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Human neural precursors (hNP) derived from embryonic stem cells (hESC) may provide a viable cellular source for transplantation therapy for Huntington's disease (HD). However, developing effective transplantation therapy for the central nervous system (CNS) using hESC relies on optimizing the in vitro production of hNP to control appropriate in vivo posttransplantation neuronal differentiation. The current study provides the first direct in vivo comparison of the transplant efficiency and posttransplantation characteristics of spontaneously derived and noggin-primed hNP following transplantation into the quinolinic acid (QA) rat model of HD. We show that spontaneously derived and noggin-primed hNP both survived robustly up to 8 weeks after transplantation into the QA-lesioned striatum of the adult rat. Transplanted hNP underwent extensive migration and large-scale differentiation towards a predominantly neuronal fate by 8 weeks post-transplantation. Furthermore, in vitro noggin priming of hNP specifically increased the extent of neuronal differentiation at both 4 and 8 weeks posttransplantation when compared to spontaneously derived hNP grafts. The results of this study suggest that in vitro noggin priming provides an effective mechanism by which to enhance hNP transplant efficiency for the treatment of HD. Copyright © 2010 Cognizant Comm. Corp.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vazey, E. M., Dottori, M., Jamshidi, P., Tomas, D., Pera, M. F., Horne, M., & Connor, B. (2010). Comparison of transplant efficiency between spontaneously derived and noggin-primed human embryonic stem cell neural precursors in the quinolinic acid rat model of Huntington’s disease. Cell Transplantation, 19(8), 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368910X494632

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free