The efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds: A meta-analysis

12Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds. A systematic literature search up to May 2022 was performed and 838 subjects with chronic wounds at the baseline of the studies; 412 of them were using the low-frequency ultrasound (225 low-frequency high-intensity contact ultrasound for diabetic foot wound ulcers, and 187 low-frequency low-intensity non-contact ultrasound for a venous leg wound ulcers), and 426 were using standard care (233 sharp debridements for diabetic foot wound ulcers and 193 sham treatments for venous leg wound ulcers). Odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The low-frequency high-intensity contact ultrasound for diabetic foot wound ulcers had significantly lower non-healed diabetic foot wound ulcers at ≥3 months (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.56, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H., Yu, Z., Liu, N., Huang, J., Liang, X., Liang, X., … Ni, J. (2023, February 1). The efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds: A meta-analysis. International Wound Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13893

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free