Comparative effects of volume loading, dobutamine, and nitroprusside in patients with predominant right ventricular infarction

141Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To assess the value of volume loading and to determine the relative efficacy of dobutamine compared with nitroprusside therapy in acute right ventricular infarction (RVMI), 13 patients with clinical, hemodynamic, and radionuclide angiographic evidence of RVMI were evaluated. In 10 patients who had an initial pulmonary arterial wedge pressure less than 18 mm Hg, volume loading did not improve cardiac index (1.9 ± 0.5 [SD] to 2.1 ± 0.4 liters/min/m2), despite significant increases in mean right atrial pressure (11 ± 2 to 15 ± 2 mm Hg, p < .001) and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (10 ± 4 to 15 ± 2 mm Hg, p < .01) by two-way analysis of variance. We conclude that volume loading does not improve cardiac index in patients with acute RVMI despite a rise in cardiac filling pressures and that infusion of dobutamine, after appropriate volume loading, produces a significant improvement in cardiac index and right ventricular ejection fraction over those after infusion of nitroprusside.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dell’Italia, L. J., Starling, M. R., Blumhardt, R., Lasher, J. C., & O’Rourke, R. A. (1985). Comparative effects of volume loading, dobutamine, and nitroprusside in patients with predominant right ventricular infarction. Circulation, 72(6), 1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.72.6.1327

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free