Abstract
Meigs analyzes the combination of asymmetry and the ability of terrorists to devise idiosyncratic means for unorthodox approaches to warfare. Moreover, he uses history to demonstrate the distinction between asymmetric and idiosyncratic attack, and the resulting impact on the current operational and strategic environments.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Meigs, M. C. (2003). Unorthodox Thoughts about AsymmetricWarfare. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2149
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free