Quantifying discordance between structure and function measurements in the clinical assessment of glaucoma

21Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a new method of quantifying and visualizing discordance between structural and functional measurements in glaucomatous eyes by predicting the visual field (VF) from retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) using a bayesian radial basis function. Methods: Five GDx VCC RNFLT scans and 5 Humphrey 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm VF tests were performed for 50 glaucomatous eyes from 50 patients. A best-available estimate (BAE) of the true VF was calculated as the pointwise median of these 5 replications. This BAE VF was compared with every RNFLT-predicted VF from the bayesian radial basis function and every measured VF. Predictability of VFs from RNFLT was established from previous data. A structure-function pattern discordance map and a structure- function discordance index (scores of 0-1) were established from the predictability limits for each structurefunction measurement pair to quantify and visualize the discordance between the structure-predicted and measured VFs.Results: The mean absolute difference between the structure- predicted and BAE VFs was 3.9 dB. The mean absolute difference between measured and BAE VFs was 2.6 dB. The mean (SD) structure-function discordance index score was 0.34 (0.11). Ninety-seven (39%) of the structure-predicted VFs showed significant discordance (structure-function discordance index score >0.3) from measured VFs. Conclusions: On average, the bayesian radial basis function predicts theBAEVFfromRNFLTslightly less well than a measured VF from the 5 VFs composing the BAE VF. The pattern discordancemaphighlights locations with structurefunction discordance, with the structure-function discordance index providing a summary index. These tools may help clinicians trust the mutually confirmatory structurefunction measurements with good concordance or identify unreliable ones with poor concordance. ©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, H., Crabb, D. P., Fredette, M. J., Anderson, D. R., & Garway-Heath, D. F. (2011). Quantifying discordance between structure and function measurements in the clinical assessment of glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology, 129(9), 1164–1174. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free