Diverse and additive cartesian abstraction heuristics

37Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have recently shown how counterexample-guided ab-straction refinement can be used to derive informative Cartesian abstraction heuristics for optimal classical planning. In this work we introduce two methods for producing diverse sets of heuristics within this framework, one based on goal facts, the other based on landmarks. In order to sum the heuristic estimates admissibly we present a novel way of finding cost partitionings for explicitly represented abstraction heuristics. We show that the resulting heuristics outperform other state-of-the-art abstraction heuristics on many benchmark domains.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seipp, J., & Helmert, M. (2014). Diverse and additive cartesian abstraction heuristics. In Proceedings International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS (Vol. 2014-January, pp. 289–297). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v24i1.13639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free