Pollinator response to female and male floral display in a monoecious species and its implications for the evolution of floral dimorphism

45Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

• Pollinator-mediated selection has been hypothesized as one cause of size dimorphism between female and male flowers. Flower number, ignored in studies of floral dimorphism, may interact with flower size to affect pollinator selectivity. • In the present study, we explored pollinator response, and estimated pollen receipt and removal, in experimental populations of monoecious Sagittaria trifolia, in which plants were manipulated to display three, six, nine or 12 female or male flowers per plant. In this species, female flowers are smaller but have a more compressed flowering period than males, creating larger female floral displays. • Overall, pollinators preferred to visit male rather than female displays of the same size. Both first visit per foraging bout and visitation rates to female displays increased with display size. However, large male displays did not show increased attractiveness to pollinators. A predicted relationship that pollen removal, rather than pollen receipt, is limited by pollinator visitation was confirmed in the experimental populations. • The results suggest that the lack of selection on large male displays may affect the evolution of floral dimorphism in this species. © New Phytologist (2006).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, S. Q., Tang, L. L., Sun, J. F., & Lu, Y. (2006). Pollinator response to female and male floral display in a monoecious species and its implications for the evolution of floral dimorphism. New Phytologist, 171(2), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01766.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free