Initial Experience and Analysis of Outcomes Using the Visualized Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Technique for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To introduce a visual surgical concept using a retrospective comparison of the outcomes between visualized percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (V-PELD) and conventional PELD techniques. MATERIAL and METHODS: Data from 61 patients in the conventional PELD group and 55 in the V-PELD group. Data included the duration of the operation, number of intraoperative radiation exposure events, and follow-up information for 24 months. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) operating time for the V-PELD group was 57.82 ± 11.25 min, and the mean duration of radiation exposure was 0.74 ± 0.32 min. The mean operating time for the conventional group was 63.16 ± 14.49 min (p<0.05), and the mean duration of radiation exposure was 2.81 ± 1.12 min (p<0.001). All patients in both groups demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI and VAS scores after surgery (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: V-PELD is a minimally invasive surgical technique that involves less radiation exposure and is more efficient for treating lumbar disc herniation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

KONG, L., DUAN, L. Q., & XU, H. G. (2020). Initial Experience and Analysis of Outcomes Using the Visualized Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Technique for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation. Turkish Neurosurgery, 30(6), 885–891. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.28909-19.3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free