Comparison of assisted reproductive technology performance after oocyte retrieval under general anaesthesia (propofol) versus paracervical local anaesthetic block: A case-controlled study

51Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Propofol (Dipirivan®) is an intravenous anaesthetic drug used for general anaesthesia. Although frequently used as a general anaesthetic for ultrasound procedures, its use during transvaginal oocyte retrieval is currently being debated. A total of 202 patients undergoing fertility treatment was included in a prospective, matched, controlled study, in which we compared fertilization rates and embryo development in terms of morphological quality and speed of development and the implications for reproductive outcome and pregnancy following general anaesthesia using either propofol or a paracervical local anaesthetic block during oocyte collection. There were no differences between the fertilization rates and the embryo cleavage characteristics for the two groups. The initial implantation rate per transferred embryo after general anaesthesia was similar to that after paracervical local anaesthetic block (13.4 versus 18.6%; P = 0.10). The ongoing clinical implantation rates per embryo transferred were also similar in the two groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christiaens, F., Janssenswillen, C., Van Steirteghem, A. C., Devroey, P., Verbbrgh, C., & Camu, F. (1998). Comparison of assisted reproductive technology performance after oocyte retrieval under general anaesthesia (propofol) versus paracervical local anaesthetic block: A case-controlled study. Human Reproduction, 13(9), 2456–2460. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.9.2456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free