DESIGN THINKING AS ACTIVE TEACHING METHODOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY -COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN COURSES

  • de Sena P
  • Cristina Marcelino Bento M
  • Matias N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a move to go beyond pedagogical concerns for engineering teaching and learning and expand to other higher education courses and other professionals, this study compared the use of Design Thinking as a tool to pedagogically mobilize courses in Business Administration, Design, Nursing and Pedagogy. The results showed that the same pedagogical concern of engineering was shared with the compared courses. The relationships between students were fundamental for solving problems, as proposed by Design Thinking, as well as the relationships between the classes of a given course with their concerns about the professional profile that is being formed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Sena, P. S., Cristina Marcelino Bento, M., Matias, N. T., & Silva, M. B. (2021). DESIGN THINKING AS ACTIVE TEACHING METHODOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY -COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN COURSES. RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218, 2(4), e24231. https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v2i4.231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free