Association between VEGF-A, C and D expression and lymph node involvement in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

10Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Metastasis is the primary cause of death in patients with breast cancer. Although VEGF-A, C and D are considered to be prime factors in lymph node metastasis in breast cancer, the published studies have conflicting conclusions. Methods: To resolve this conflict, we conducted a meta-analysis of 37 studies (n = 5,001 patients) evaluating the correlation between VEGF-A, C and D immunohistochemical expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM). The meta-analysis included 22 studies of VEGF-A, 17 of VEGF-C, and 6 of VEGF-D. The relationships between VEGF-A, C and D and clinicopathological parameters were also examined. Results: The results showed a significant association between VEGF-A or VEGF-C overexpression and LNM (risk ratio [RR] = 1.28 [95% CI 1.04-1.58], p = 0.02; and RR = 1.36 [95% CI 1.07-1.72], p = 0.01, respectively). Subgroup evaluation showed a significant association between VEGF-A, C and D overexpression and LNM when analyses were limited to Asian patients (RR = 1.78 [95% CI 1.28-2.46], p = 0.0005; RR = 1.38 [95% CI 1.04-1.84], p = 0.03, and RR = 2.62 [95% CI 1.35-5.09], p = 0.004, respectively). VEGF-A overexpression was significantly associated with lymph vessel invasion (RR = 1.86 [95% CI 1.33-2.60], p = 0.0003). Overexpression of VEGF-C or VEGF-D was significantly associated with HER-2 positivity (RR = 1.30 [95% CI 1.06-1.59], p = 0.01; and RR = 1.75 [95% CI 1.01-3.03], p = 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: With some limitations, our meta-analysis indicated that VEGF-A and C could predict LNM in patients with breast cancer, particularly Asian patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Su, F., Liu, B., Chen, M., Xiao, J., Li, X., Lv, X., … Zhang, Y. (2016). Association between VEGF-A, C and D expression and lymph node involvement in breast cancer: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Biological Markers, 31(3), e235–e244. https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.5000198

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free