Methodological implications of simultaneous solid-phase peptide synthesis: a comparison of active esters.

ISSN: 10405704
12Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Simultaneous competition and comparison methods have been used to compare the activities of a wide variety of reactive esters for solid phase peptide synthesis. The results generally conform to expectations from the literature; the most active being dinitrophenyl esters. Pentafluorophenyl esters provide the most suitable selection for routine use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hudson, D. (1990). Methodological implications of simultaneous solid-phase peptide synthesis: a comparison of active esters. Peptide Research, 3(1), 51–55.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free