Modified technique for correction of gynaecomastia

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To test a modification of the circumareolar incision for correction of a gynaecomastia from the points of view of complications and appearance of the scar. Design: Clinical study. Setting: Military and university hospitals, Turkey. Subjects: 32 patients with gynaecomastia operated on between 1992 and 2000. Interventions: Simon I patients were treated with an inferior semicircular periareolar incision (n = 12). Half of the Simon II patients had the same incision and the others were treated with a modified extended incision (n = 10 in each group). Main outcome measures: Haematoma, skin necrosis, nipple inversion, low-seated nipple, asymmetry, hypoaesthesia and hypertrophic scar. Results: Simon II patients treated with the unmodified incision had more haematomas and seromas than Simon I patients and worse cosmesis (p = 0.009 and p = 0.02). However, the complication rates did not differ significantly compared with the Simon II patients who had the modified incision. Conclusion: A modified extended circumareolar incision results in fewer complication and better cosmesis in grade II gynaecomastia than the standard incision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coskun, A., Duzgun, S. A., Bozer, M., Akinci, O. F., & Uzunkoy, A. (2001). Modified technique for correction of gynaecomastia. European Journal of Surgery, 167(11), 822–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/11024150152717643

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free