A comparative analysis of amlodipine and felodipine in a military outpatient population: Efficacy, outcomes, and cost considerations

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This retrospective study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and cost of two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. Methods: Charts of patients who had been on continuous antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine or felodipine for at least 6 months were reviewed. Analyses include mean changes in blood pressure, percentage of patients achieving blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg, average dose, and cost per day of the two calcium channel blockers, average cost of additional medication, total medication cost per day, and cost to achieve BP control. Results: Eighty-seven percent of amlodipine-treated patients achieved BP control compared with 33% of felodipine-treated patients. Total medication cost to achieve BP control was $0.87 per day for patients on amlodipine compared with $1.79 per day for patients on felodipine. Conclusions: Amlodipine produced BP control in a greater percentage of patients than did felodipine at a lower total cost to achieve BP control. When evaluating the total cost of antihypertensive treatment, the cost of a drug alone can be misleading.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blivin, S. J., Pippins, J., Annis, L. G., & Lyons, F. (2003). A comparative analysis of amlodipine and felodipine in a military outpatient population: Efficacy, outcomes, and cost considerations. Military Medicine, 168(7), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/168.7.530

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free