Relationships and taxonomy of New Zealand wheatgrasses

47Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Studies of the genomic constitution of the New Zealand grasses of the tribe Triticeae confirm their relationship to the widespread genus Elymus L. as typified by E. sibiricus L., and defined by an alloploid genome. That genome is composed of the haplome H, derived from Critesion Rafin. (Hordeum subgenus Hordeastrum), and the haplome S, derived from Pseudoroegneria (Nevski) Löve (Elytrigia sect. Pseudoroegneria). Five species found in New Zealand and previously included in Agropyron are referable to the East African-Central Asiatic-Australasian section Anthosachne (Steud.) Tzvelev of Elymus. These species are (chromosome numbers and synonyms in parentheses): Elymus reetisetus (Nees) Löve et Connor (2n = 42, Agropyron scabrum p.p, A. youngii), E. multiflorus (Hook. L) Löve et Connor (2n = 42, A. kirkii) with var. multiflorus and var. longisetus (Hack.) Löve et Connor; E. enysii (Kirk) Löve et Connor (2n = 28, A. enysii); E. tenuis (Buch.) Löve et Connor (2n = 56, A. tenue); E. apricus Löve et Connor described as new (2n = 42, A. scabrum p.p.). The tetraploid has the genomic formula HS, the octoploid HHSS, and the hexaploids have the constitution HSS. Two species, formerly placed in Cockaynea Zotov, also share the genomic formula HS, but represent in Elymus the endemic section Stenostachys (Turcz.) Löve et Connor. Their correct names are E. narduroides (Turcz.) Löve et Connor (2n = 28, Cockaynea gracilis), and E. laevis (Petrie) Löve et Connor (2n = 28, C. laevis). All 7 species are obligately sexual and at least facultatively autogamous, but E. rectisetus includes populations that are facultatively to obligately agamospermous and obligately pseudogamous. © 1982 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Löve, Á., & Connor, H. E. (1982). Relationships and taxonomy of New Zealand wheatgrasses. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 20(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1982.10428838

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free