A comparison of Plasmalyte 148 and 0.9% saline for intra‐operative fluid replacement

202Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Thirty patients undergoing major hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either 0.9% saline or Plasmalyte 148 (a balanced salt solution), at 15 ml.kg‐1.h‐1. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed before and after surgery. Plasma biochemistry (Na+, K+, Cl‐, lactate) measurements were made before and after surgery and at 24 h after surgery. The patients receiving 0.9% saline had significantly increased chloride concentrations (p < 0.01), decreased standard bicarbonate concentrations (p < 0.01) and increased base deficit (p < 0.01) compared to those receiving Plasmalyte 148. There were no significant changes in plasma sodium or potassium or blood lactate concentrations in either group. The exclusive use of 0.9% saline intra‐operatively can produce a temporary hyperchloraemic acidosis which could be given false pathological significance. In addition it may exacerbate an acidosis resulting from an actual pathological stale. The use of a balanced salt solution such as Plasmalyte 148 may avoid these complications. Copyright © 1994, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McFARLANE, C., & LEE, A. (1994). A comparison of Plasmalyte 148 and 0.9% saline for intra‐operative fluid replacement. Anaesthesia, 49(9), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04450.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free