REDD+ on the rocks? Conflict over Forest and Politics of Justice in Vietnam

34Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In Vietnam, villagers involved in a REDD+ (reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) pilot protect areas with rocks which have barely a tree on them. The apparent paradox indicates how actual practices differ from general ideas about REDD+ due to ongoing conflict over forest, and how contestations over the meaning of justice are a core element in negotiations over REDD+. We explore these politics of justice by examining how the actors involved in the REDD+ pilot negotiate the particular subjects, dimensions, and authority of justice considered relevant, and show how politics of justice are implicit to practical decisions in project implementation. Contestations over the meaning of justice are an important element in the practices and processes constituting REDD+ at global, national and local levels, challenging uniform definitions of forest justice and how forests ought to be managed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sikor, T., & Càm, H. (2016). REDD+ on the rocks? Conflict over Forest and Politics of Justice in Vietnam. Human Ecology, 44(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9821-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free