Conversations on the "good death": the bioethical debate on euthanasia

11Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite extensive current debate on euthanasia, many open and apparently unsolvable issues persist, awaiting a better conceptual treatment. The area includes "prejudices and fundamentalisms" in relation to the theme, still viewed as taboo by a major share of society, specifically in the case of Brazil, while semantic imprecision in the term and argumentative tensions surround the issue, focusing on the principles of sacredness of life, quality of life, and autonomy and the so-called "slippery slope" argument. The purpose of the current essay is thus to serve as a sphere of inquiry concerning euthanasia, moving from historical antecedents towards a better solution to the problem and the demarcation of necessary future perspectives for enhanced understanding of the issue.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siqueira-Batista, R., & Schramm, F. R. (2005). Conversations on the “good death”: the bioethical debate on euthanasia. Cadernos de Saúde Pública / Ministério Da Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, 21(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2005000100013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free