Towards a better comprehension of similarity measures used in medical image registration

61Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While intensity-based similarity measures are increasingly used for medical image registration, they often rely on implicit assumptions regarding the physics of imaging. The motivation of this paper is to determine what are the assumptions corresponding to a number of popular similarity measures in order to better understand their use, and finally help choosing the one which is the most appropriate for a given class of problems. After formalizing registration based on general image acquisition models, we show that the search for an optimal measure can be cast into a maximum likelihood estimation problem. We then derive similarity measures corresponding to different modeling assumptions and retrieve some well-known measures (correlation coefficient, correlation ratio, mutual information). Finally, we present results of registration between 3D MR and 3D Ultrasound images to illustrate the importance of choosing an appropriate similarity measure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roche, A., Malandain, G., Ayache, N., & Prima, S. (1999). Towards a better comprehension of similarity measures used in medical image registration. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1679, pp. 555–567). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/10704282_60

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free