American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference Summary Report

15Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives The 2016 American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference brought together thought leaders in the field of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The goal was to identify critical areas of need for future research. This article summarizes the findings. Methods Prior to the conference, 5 major focus areas were identified. Focus areas were explored over the 2-day conference. Clinicians, clinical and basic science researchers, and representatives from government agencies, industry, patient advocacy groups, and the public convened to identify the major gaps in knowledge in each of these focus areas. Results The 5 major topics were as follows: (1) mechanistic research on pelvic supportive structures and how these are altered with pregnancy, delivery, and aging; (2) novel prostheses or implants that address pathophysiology and provide mechanical support; (3) large-scale community-based research; (4) clinical trials to optimize outcomes after POP surgery; and (5) evidence-based quality measures for POP outcomes. Key recommendations were made for each topic. Conclusions Critical gaps in our knowledge were identified. These limit scientific discovery across all 5 topic areas. Further scientific progress would be advanced by (1) developing a standardized group of POP outcomes and quality measures for large trials and community-based research, (2) creating specimen biorepositories that are integrated with robust clinical data, and (3) developing collaborative teams with expertise from a variety of disciplines, convened to tackle our most challenging and complex scientific questions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siddiqui, N. Y., Gregory, W. T., Handa, V. L., Delancey, J. O. L., Richter, H. E., Moalli, P., … Bradley, C. S. (2018). American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference Summary Report. In Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (Vol. 24, pp. 260–263). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free