Design dichotomy: Impact of design intervention on the recreational open spaces of urban India—a photo essay

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Well performing recreational open spaces (ROSs) are essential amenities that improve the quality of urban life in the context of rapid urbanization prevalent in developing nations. In Indian cities, the quantity and quality of recreational amenities like parks and playgrounds do not compare well with global standards. Design interventions that are undertaken while developing ROSs significantly impact their value in terms of attractiveness, accessibility, and usability. To evaluate this impact, an empirical survey of select ROSs was conducted in Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Chennai. The analysis revealed the dichotomous nature of design interventions. Multiple interventions or ‘too much design’ resulted in the open space losing its ‘openness’ and allowed only an orchestrated use of space. Whereas the lack of any intentional intervention or ‘too little design’ resulted in informality, which made the open space susceptible to encroachment. Using photographic evidence, this essay illustrates the dichotomous nature of design intervention affecting the use value of ROSs in urban India.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Subramanian, D., & Jana, A. (2018). Design dichotomy: Impact of design intervention on the recreational open spaces of urban India—a photo essay. Berkeley Planning Journal. University of California at Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.5070/bp330137637

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free