Forgoing the flexibility of real options: When and why Firms commit to investment decisions

19Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Real option investments benefit from the flexibility associated with the possibility of abandonment should investment returns prove insufficient. But a firm also benefits from making commitments that engender reciprocal commitments on the part of employees and partner firms, and that allow the firm to address markets that exhibit increasing returns with the speed and scale required for success. I investigate the conditions under which large firms commit to investments in small firm equity alliances and acquisitions, and find that large firms commit to relationships that they initiate and that are subject to a high degree of rivalry. Uncertainty was not a significant predictor of the choice to commit. My findings point to the discretionary nature of the choice to commit and to firms' willingness to commit to investment decisions, despite high uncertainty, during periods of strong growth. © 2008 British Academy of Management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dalziel, M. (2009). Forgoing the flexibility of real options: When and why Firms commit to investment decisions. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00601.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free