Survival of Salmonella enterica in Military Low-Moisture Food Products during Long-Term Storage at 4, 25, and 408°C

6Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Salmonella enterica has been increasingly implicated in foodborne outbreaks involving low-moisture foods (LMF) during the recent decade. This study aimed to investigate the potential for persistence of S. enterica in a range of LMF during storage at three temperatures. LMF products, boil-in-bag eggs (freeze-dried product), chocolate protein drink, cran-raspberry First Strike bars, mocha dessert bar, and peanut butter, were inoculated with a five-strain cocktail of S. enterica and stored at 4, 25, or 40°C for 36 months. Salmonella populations remained above 7 log CFU/g in all products stored at 4°C and above 6 log CFU/g in products stored at 25°C, excluding the cran-raspberry First Strike bars. Storage at 40°C resulted in Salmonella populations above 5.5 log CFU/g in boil-in-bag eggs after 36 months and demonstrated survivability for 12 months or less in the other five products. Additionally, a mocha bar production temperature profile study identified rapid cooling of bars in which the temperatures reached would have no measurable impact on Salmonella populations. The results indicate the ability of Salmonella to survive in a variety of LMF category foods, even under adverse storage conditions and identifies how the food matrix may affect Salmonella survivability. The data indicate the importance of establishing food processing procedures that adequately mitigate the presence of Salmonella throughout food processing systems, while also increasing comprehensive understanding of Salmonella survivability mechanisms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flock, G., Richardson, M., Pacitto-Reilly, D., Anderson, N., Chen, F., Ahnrud, G., … Senecal, A. (2022). Survival of Salmonella enterica in Military Low-Moisture Food Products during Long-Term Storage at 4, 25, and 408°C. Journal of Food Protection, 85(4), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-21-321

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free