How Should Physicians Respond When They Learn Patients Are Using Unapproved Gene Editing Interventions?

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hundreds of gene therapies are currently in various stages of research and development. A subset of these involve gene editing technologies such as CRISPR. In this hypothetical case, a patient with chronic pain has initiated a CRISPR-based intervention obtained from a clinic in the Cayman Islands. His physician doubts it is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and worries about its safety. The case presents ethical questions about potential violations of US regulations regarding the sale of products intended to affect human health, patients' lack of understanding about risks of unproven drugs, and suboptimal support for and management of patients with chronic pain. We discuss how physicians should address these questions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, C. R., & Caplan, A. L. (2019, December 1). How Should Physicians Respond When They Learn Patients Are Using Unapproved Gene Editing Interventions? AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.1021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free