Abstract
Psychiatric care has historically conceptualized human distress in ways that pathologize and stigmatize typical responses to traumatic events. The Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF) is a theoretical framework that provides an alternative conceptualization of traumatic distress. The framework promotes positive social action and advocates for structural and systemic change by challenging conventional models of diagnoses that are known to perpetuate mental health-related stigma. However, there is limited evidence of effective implementation of the PTMF in real-world healthcare settings. This article uses a critical narrative synthesis, which is an interpretive approach that synthesizes information from a diverse sample of articles, to examine existing research on the application of the PTMF in various healthcare environments. Three electronic databases were searched using key terms, yielding 90 titles. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, 46 articles were chosen for extraction and analysis. The literature positions the PTMF as a tool for questioning and rethinking foundational concepts in medical and psychiatric services. Our analysis suggests that the PTMF’s widespread adoption and potential to drive systemic change may be hindered by philosophical incompatibilities with current diagnostic frameworks and the lack of efficacy studies to date. Incorporating the PTMF alongside existing diagnostic frameworks offers a strength-focused approach that complements traditional diagnostic methods.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Atkinson, T. M., Nathan, L., & Sukhera, J. I. (2025). The Power Threat Meaning Framework: A Socially Conscious Shift in the Conceptualization of Mental and Physical Health. Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion, 6(4), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770251351955
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.