Non-urgent patients in emergency departments: Prioritisation, orientation, and selection through the prism of social sciences

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Emergency departments overcrowding is often attributed to inappropriate use by patients who ought to be treated in primary care. This article challenges this assertion by examining the articulation of medical and social definitions of non-urgent patients within medical and sociological literature, and how they translate into prioritisation, selection and triage criteria. It shows that triage practices, which are necessary for prioritising life-threatening emergencies are not only based on clinical criteria, but also incorporate moral and social considerations which can lead to discrimination and hinder equitable access to care, particularly for the most vulnerable patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Labainville, I., & Lefève, C. (2023). Non-urgent patients in emergency departments: Prioritisation, orientation, and selection through the prism of social sciences. Medecine/Sciences, 39(6–7), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free