Reproducibility is a process, not an achievement: The replicability of IR reproducibility experiments

16Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper espouses a view of reproducibility in the computational sciences as a process and not just a point-in-time “achievement”. As a concrete case study, we revisit the Open-Source IR Reproducibility Challenge from 2015 and attempt to replicate those experiments: four years later, are those computational artifacts still functional? Perhaps not surprisingly, we are not able to replicate most of the retrieval runs encapsulated by those artifacts in a modern computational environment. We outline the various idiosyncratic reasons why, distilled into a series of “lessons learned” to help form an emerging set of best practices for the long-term sustainability of reproducibility efforts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Reproducibility is a process, not an achievement: The replicability of IR reproducibility experiments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 12036 LNCS, pp. 43–49). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free