Abstract
This paper espouses a view of reproducibility in the computational sciences as a process and not just a point-in-time “achievement”. As a concrete case study, we revisit the Open-Source IR Reproducibility Challenge from 2015 and attempt to replicate those experiments: four years later, are those computational artifacts still functional? Perhaps not surprisingly, we are not able to replicate most of the retrieval runs encapsulated by those artifacts in a modern computational environment. We outline the various idiosyncratic reasons why, distilled into a series of “lessons learned” to help form an emerging set of best practices for the long-term sustainability of reproducibility efforts.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lin, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Reproducibility is a process, not an achievement: The replicability of IR reproducibility experiments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 12036 LNCS, pp. 43–49). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.