Biomechanical evaluation of acrylic external skeletal fixation in dogs and cats.

51Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Acrylic external skeletal fixators (ESF) were compared with Kirschner ESF in biomechanical tests. A 2-cm unilateral acrylic ESF was found to be superior to medium Kirschner ESF in compression and shear loads. Acrylic ESF performed as well as Kirschner ESF in torsion loads. Acrylic ESF were used on 11 dogs and cats for repair of long bone fractures, for arthrodesis, or for immobilization of joints following ligament or tendon surgery. There were no complications associated with the use of acrylic ESF. Acrylic ESF offers the advantage of reduced cost, improved versatility, and simplified application technique when compared with Kirschner ESF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okrasinski, E. B., Pardo, A. D., & Graehler, R. A. (1991). Biomechanical evaluation of acrylic external skeletal fixation in dogs and cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 199(11), 1590–1593. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1991.199.11.1590

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free