An investigation on the effect of ultrasonication and microfiltration processing on the quality of king coconut (Cocos nucifera var. aurantiaca) water compared to minimal and thermal processing

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effect of thermal and non-thermal processing on the physicochemical, microbial, and sensory characteristics of king coconut water. King coconut water samples were subjected to ultrasonication (50 kHz, 30 min at 35 °C), microfiltration (0.5 µm), and thermal treatments (at 90 °C for 10 min) with sodium metabisulfite (0.1 g/L) except the fresh sample (control). Samples were tested for physiochemical, microbial, and sensory parameters. Storage studies were conducted at 4 °C for 28 days. pH, titratable acidity, and total sugar of all treated samples were within the Sri Lankan Standard (SLS) limit (4.6–5.5, 0.07–0.1%, 4.1–6.5%, respectively) during the 28 days of storage. Sodium metabisulfite addition was significant in lowering the browning index. Antioxidant and phenolic contents of microfiltered and ultrasonicated samples varied between 49%–65% and 2.5−2.8 GAE mg/100 mL, respectively, during 4 weeks of storage, which was significantly higher compared to the heat-treated samples. Sensory evaluation scored the lowest attribute values for thermally treated samples. Microbial analyses indicated that microfiltered and ultrasonicated king coconut water remained safe for consumption for up to 4 weeks. Ultrasound and microfiltration, with the integration of sodium metabisulfite, were identified as effective methods for processing king coconut water while preserving its wholesome properties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bandara, R. R., Sasmini, T., Hewa Pathirana, D. T., Yalegama, C., Arachchige, M., & Sivaji, M. (2025). An investigation on the effect of ultrasonication and microfiltration processing on the quality of king coconut (Cocos nucifera var. aurantiaca) water compared to minimal and thermal processing. Food Science and Technology International, 31(7), 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132241248480

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free