Abstract
Many of Peter Singer’s ideas runs contrary to commonly accepted viewpoints. This, of course, is no reason to criticize any thinker, but it does encourage others to carefully investigate how such conclusions have been reached. In this article I examine Singer’s utilitarian views on the expendability of life, noting apparent flaws in Singer’s “replaceability argument.”
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Kemmerer, L. A. (2007). Peter Singer on Expendability. Between the Species: An Online Journal for the Study of Philosophy and Animals, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.2007v13n7.3
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free