Developing and validating instrument of alignment understanding with school assessment practice

  • Abdullah E
  • Shukor A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate the Understanding Alignment with School Assessment Practice instrument (2KAPS). The instrument consists of 27 items. The 2KAPS questionnaire validation involves 109 teachers who taught Form 1 and Form 2 students (teachers directly involved in the School Assessment Practice implementation) in one district in Perak. The instrument was developed in several stages such as building the understanding alignment model and an assessment practice generated based on alignment models from the literature review, determining the main constructs in the assessment expectations, determining the chosen practice in line with the assessment expectations, the use of the Likert scale with three categories (Full agreement=3, Lack of agreement=2 and No Agreement=1) which indicated that there was an alignment between the assessment practice and the teachers' assessment understanding, acquiring the content validity from experts and the analysis of items using the Rasch Measurement Model. The instrument validity and reliability had been conducted by identifying the Rasch fit statistics, item difficulty, unidimensionality, item reliability as well as 2KAPS item map. The Rasch analysis showed that the item reliability was valued at 0.92 while the Cronbach Alpha value was 0.90. All the items fit the model as their MNSQ values were between 0.7 and 1.35. The dispersion of items from 2KAPS data was 3.29 which indicated the existence of 3 to 4 item strata. No item showed a negative point measure correlation or less than 0.2 and this generally indicated that the item discrimination was very good. The data showed that the mean for a person was measured at 1.19 logits with a standard deviation of 1.12 logits while the item mean value was zero with a standard deviation of 0.52. This indicates that the position of item and person does not fully match and thus shows a medium difficulty. The overall item quality was good and all 27 items of 2KAPS were retained. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by IASE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdullah, E. M., Shukor, A. A. A., Abdullah, N., & Arip, M. A. S. M. (2016). Developing and validating instrument of alignment understanding with school assessment practice. International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 3(11), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.11.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free