Mineral resources and conflicts in DRC: A case of ecological fallacy?

71Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We estimate the impact of geo-located mining concessions on the number of conflict events recorded in the Democratic Republic of the Congo between 1997 and 2007. Instrumenting the variable of interest with historical concessions interacted with changes in international prices of minerals, we unveil an ecological fallacy: whereas concessions have no effect on the number of conflicts at the territory level (lowest administrative unit), they do foster violence at the district level (higher administrative unit). We develop and validate empirically a theoretical model where the incentives of armed groups to exploit and protect mineral resources explain our empirical findings. © Oxford University Press 2013. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maystadt, J. F., De Luca, G., Sekeris, P. G., & Ulimwengu, J. (2014). Mineral resources and conflicts in DRC: A case of ecological fallacy? Oxford Economic Papers, 66(3), 721–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpt037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free