Permanency Planning and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act: The Paradox of Child Welfare Policy

  • Jimenez M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The policies of the 1974 Child Abuse Prevention & Treatment Act (CAPTA) & the 1980 Adoption Assistance & Child Welfare Act (AACWA) are examined. Though both acts stem from the Progressive era conviction that the family has a duty to be instrumental in a child's development & the 1960s & 1970s interest in social equality, civil liberties, &, consequently, children's rights, the two acts impose conflicting mandates. CAPTA, emerging from media attention to the battered child syndrome, emphasized professional intervention with troubled families. AACWA, stemming from a more conservative, laissez-faire approach to child welfare, was based on the assumption that protecting the family from outside interference was the best way to protect the interests of the child. The contradictions inherent in these two policies insure that the best interests of the child will not be served. 34 References. D. Generoli

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jimenez, M. A. (1990). Permanency Planning and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act: The Paradox of Child Welfare Policy. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.1948

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free