Basque Differential Object Marking as a Contact-Induced Phenomenon: How and Why?

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The debate as to whether syntax can be borrowed has spurred much scholarly inquiry among those who argue that syntax cannot be borrowed (Silva-Corvalán, 2008) and those in favor of the 'anything-goes' argument (Thomason, 2001). In contribution to this debate, this study examines the contact-induced processes behind the variation of Basque Differential Object Marking (dom). We examine the use of Basque dom in the spontaneous speech of 42 speakers whose variety has been in a long-standing contact with Spanish (Gernika Basque) and 15 speakers of a 'newly' standardized variety (Standard Basque). We additionally examine the spontaneous speech of their leísmo in order to make a case that Basque dom is not an example of syntactic borrowing but involves a process of replica grammaticalization (Heine and Kuteva, 2005) whereby speakers replicate their use of leísmo either through matter-borrowing, pattern-borrowing or a combination of both.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. (2020). Basque Differential Object Marking as a Contact-Induced Phenomenon: How and Why? Journal of Language Contact. Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-bja10007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free