Bringing Back the Debate on Mediated and Unmediated Science Communication: the Public’s Perspective

14Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When analysing the actors of the science communication ecosystem, scholarly research has focused on the perceptions and attitudes of scientists, science journalists, and science communicators. How the public envisages the roles of science producers and mediators is mostly uncharted territory. We address this gap, by examining the results of a public consultation in Portugal concerning science communication. We show that the public demonstrates a clear preference for science communication performed by scientists, over journalists, although credibility and trust depend on multiple factors. We also ascertain that professional science communicators are mostly invisible, though the public recognises the value of ‘translators’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Delicado, A., Rowland, J., & Estevens, J. (2021). Bringing Back the Debate on Mediated and Unmediated Science Communication: the Public’s Perspective. Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free