Abstract
Purpose:This research aimed to compare the effect of two intervention programs using stable or unstable surfaces on speed and hitting distance in golf stroke/swing. Methods:Twenty-five elite golfers (19.20 ± 1.77 years, height = 181.12 ± 4 cm, body mass = 75.35 ± 5.83; kg, BMI = 22.71 ± 1.76 kg.m2, handicap: 2.49 ± 2.56) were randomly assigned to two different 8-week training programs based on unstable surface (n = 12) or stable surface training (n=13). Measurements of carry distance and club head speed were performed using the Trackman Golf® system, with each participant executing five swings and obtaining the average and best distance. Results: No significant changes (p< 0.05) in the club head speed or carry distance were found after the intervention in the stable surface or the unstable surface training group. Conclusions: The proposed intervention using instability surfaces does not provide any additional benefit to training on stable surfaces in the specific performance of the stroke in elite golfers.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sillero, M. G., Peruzzi, C., Chulvi-Medrano, I., Peña, J., de Diego, M., & Molina, S. V. (2022). Effects of 8-weeks of stable vs unstable surface destabilizing training on shot outcome in elite golfers. Retos, 45, 756–762. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v44i0.91771
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.