Limiting Labor: Business Political Mobilization and Union Setback in the States

  • Dixon M
31Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The 1940s were heady times for the American labor movement. The tight wartime labor market and the backing of the federal government in defense industries facilitated impressive membership gains for both AFL and CIO unions. By 1945, labor unions represented almost 35 percent of the workforce—a more than fivefold increase from the early 1930s. What is more, union membership gains penetrated previously unorganized and resistant regions like the South. Unions indeed appeared on the verge of recruiting millions of new members and establishing a truly national social movement. Critics and supporters alike viewed unions as the most powerful institutions of the day. Following the war, Fortune Magazine foresaw little resistance to unionism and to the postwar southern labor organizing drives, while sympathetic scholars like C. Wright Mills viewed labor leaders as the “new men of power.”

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dixon, M. (2007). Limiting Labor: Business Political Mobilization and Union Setback in the States. Journal of Policy History, 19(3), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1353/jph.2007.0015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free