How reliable are the effects of self-control training?: A re-examination using self-report and physical measures

5Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In light of recent challenges to the strength model of self-control, our study re-examines the effects of self-control training on established physical and self-report measures of self-control. We also examined whether beliefs about the malleability of self-control qualify any training effects. Participants in the training condition were assigned to increase use of their non-dominant hand for two weeks, and did comply mainly if they held high-malleability beliefs; yet, compared to a control condition, the physical measure of self-control did not improve. This was also evident in a secondary objective measure of self-control, a Stroop task, as well as in self-reported self-control. The discussion focuses on the lack of replication of training effects on self-control.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, B. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2017). How reliable are the effects of self-control training?: A re-examination using self-report and physical measures. PLoS ONE, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free