Agreement between the spatio-temporal gait parameters from treadmill-based photoelectric cell and the instrumented treadmill system in healthy young adults and stroke patients

42Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Treadmill gait analysis was more advantageous than over-ground walking because it allowed continuous mea- surements of the gait parameters. The purpose of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity and the test-retest reliability of the OPTOGait photoelectric cell system against the treadmill-based gait analysis sys- tem by assessing spatio-temporal gait parameters. Material/Methods: Twenty-six stroke patients and 18 healthy adults were asked to walk on the treadmill at their preferred speed. The concurrent validity was assessed by comparing data obtained from the 2 systems, and the test-retest re- liability was determined by comparing data obtained from the 1st and the 2nd session of the OPTOGait system. Results: The concurrent validity, identified by the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC [2, 1]), coefficients of variation (CVME), and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for the spatial-temporal gait parameters, were excellent but the temporal parameters expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle were poor. The test-retest reliability of the OPTOGait System, identified by ICC (3, 1), CVME, 95% LOA, standard error of measurement (SEM), and min- imum detectable change (MDC95%) for the spatio-temporal gait parameters, was high. Conclusions: These findings indicated that the treadmill-based OPTOGait System had strong concurrent validity and test-re- test reliability. This portable system could be useful for clinical assessments. © Med Sci Monit, 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, M., Song, C., Lee, K., Shin, D., & Shin, S. (2014). Agreement between the spatio-temporal gait parameters from treadmill-based photoelectric cell and the instrumented treadmill system in healthy young adults and stroke patients. Medical Science Monitor, 20, 1210–1219. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890658

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free