Individualized Analytics: Within-Person and Idiographic Analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two research paradigms are commonly used: between-person (often known as nomothetic or group-based) and within-person analysis. The between-person approach captures data across different people and gathers their variations, hence the name of between-person. Within-person research captures data within the same person, gathering these variations across times or occasions and thus the name. These two approaches converge if and only if ergodicity holds. Ergodicity claims that people are similar (so that it does not matter whom to measure) and they do not change over time (so that it does not matter when to measure). However, this is often not the case in education research. Thus, the within-person approach is needed. When within-person analysis is conducted on a single person (N=1), it is known as idiographic analysis. In this chapter, we describe the main characteristics of each approach, as well as common data sources and methods used in within-person and idiographic analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., & Ito, H. (2025). Individualized Analytics: Within-Person and Idiographic Analysis. In Advanced Learning Analytics Methods: AI, Precision and Complexity (pp. 471–491). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95365-1_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free