Female Genital Cutting: Clinical knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices from a Provider survey in the US

28Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Migration from countries where female genital cutting (FGC) is practiced means women’s healthcare providers need to meet this population’s unique healthcare needs. We explored providers’ FGC-related experience, knowledge of the cultural practice, prior training, attitudes towards medicalization, including reinfibulation, and clinical practice. An online, 53-question survey to a multidisciplinary sample of women’s health providers in the US were recruited by email via professional organizations, medical departments, and the authors’ professional networks. From a total of 508 usable surveys, nearly half of respondents did not receive formal FGC training, but a majority had cared for FGC-affected women in their practice. A ‘know-do’ gap existed with managing infibulated patients; and surgical defibulation procedures were not routinely offered. Most respondents (79%, n = 402) reported a desire for additional education. Women’s healthcare providers in the US, regardless of disciplinary backgrounds, are inadequately prepared to meet the needs of FGC-affected women. To address these, FGC content needs to be embedded in educational and training curricula, and ongoing clinical mentorship made available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lane, J. L., Johnson-Agbakwu, C. E., Warren, N., Budhathoki, C., & Cole, E. C. (2019). Female Genital Cutting: Clinical knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices from a Provider survey in the US. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21(5), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0833-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free